Lucifer in Starlight by George Meredith :: Lucifer in Starlight George Meredith

Lucifer in Starlight by George Meredith Examining a poem in detail can bring out new meanings and ideas. By careful analysis, the full beauty of the poem can be appreciated. The poem "Lucifer in Starlight (p. 959)", by George Meredith, can be analyzed to refine the authors purpose, by examining every subtle hint, every possibility, for a deeper theme. Also, "deciphering" formal literary techniques such as metaphor, connotation, and symbolism is the key to unlock other expressions. The main theme of the poem is that Lucifer has no place out of his hell, and anything he tries to reenter heaven is futile. As with any poem, it is best to first examine how the title, "Lucifer in Starlight" relates to the body of the poem. Obviously, Lucifer is the defiant angel that was banished from heaven, and sent to the underworld of hell, where he known as Satan. The title refers to the devil as "in starlight", so this means he has to rise to a place where the stars are visible, not the fires of hell. This rising from the underworld is summed up in the first line. It is later explained that he is doing so because he is tired of his 'dark dominion." Ironically, the first line refers to Lucifer honorably, as a "Prince", while in the second line he is tagged as a fiend. This leaves the reader feeling perplexed, yet still thinking of Lucifer as the enemy. At first it may seem as Lucifer has risen to the Earth, but it is further clarified that he has elevated himself above the "rolling ball". However, god imagined the world as planar, with heaven on a higher plane, and hell on a lower plane, not spherical as defined here. From his place in the stars above earth, Lucifer looks down through the clouds, a nd observes the sinners. He is talking about the denizens of the earth, for since Adam sinned in the beginning, all of his sons and daughters are also sinners. Perhaps he can relate to them, as he is also trying for entrance to heaven. For now , he sets his mind on the people who will become denizens of his hell eventually. Here Meredith shows how much hubris the devil really has, for the reader can just see Lucifer savoring over the masses entering his vile domain. Then, Lucifer peers at the most extreme places in the world, describing the sands of Africa.

Scope Limitation

ScopeThe scope of the study refers to the parameters under which the study will be operating. The problem you seek to resolve will fit within certain parameters. Think of the scope as the domain of your research—what’s in the domain, and what is not. You need to make it as clear as possible what you will be studying and what factors are within the accepted range of your study. For example, if you are studying the ill effects of bullying on middle school children, the scope could include both face-to-face bullying and cyber-bullying in grades 6 through 8.LimitationsLimitations are matters and occurrences that arise in a study which are out of the researcher's control. They limit the extensity to which a study can go, and sometimes affect the end result and conclusions that can be drawn. Every study, no matter how well it is conducted and constructed, has limitations. This is one of the reasons why we do not use the words â€Å"prove† and â€Å"disprove† wit h respect to research findings. It is always possible that future research may cast doubt on the validity of any hypothesis or conclusion from a study. Your study might have access to only certain people in an organization, certain documents, and certain data. These are limitations. Subsequent studies may overcome these limitations.Limitations of Qualitative StudiesA limitation associated with qualitative study is related to validity and reliability. â€Å"Because qualitative research occurs in the natural setting it is extremely difficult to replicate studies† (Wiersma, 2000, p. 211). When you select certain methodologies and designs, for example phenomenology, they come with limitations over which you may have little control.Limitations of Case StudiesWe cannot make causal inferences from case studies, because we cannot rule out alternative explanations. It is always unclear about the generality of the findings of a case study. A case study involves the behavior of one pers on, group, or organization. The behavior of this one unit of analysis may or may not reflect the behavior of similar entities. Case studies may be suggestive of what may be found in similar organizations, but additional research would be needed to verify whether findings from one study would generalize elsewhere.Limitations of Correlational StudiesCorrelational research merely demonstrates that we can predict the behavior of one variable from the behavior of another variable. If a relationship exists then there is an association between variables. However, two variables can be associated without there being a causal relationship between the variables. If we find that X is associated with Y, it could mean that X caused Y, or Y caused X, or some â€Å"third† (confounding) variable caused both X and Y without there being any causal relationship between X and Y.Correlational research may also have limitations with respect to the generality of the findings. Perhaps the study invol ved a specific group of people, or that the relationship between the variables was only investigated under some situation or circumstance. Thus, it may be uncertain whether the correlational findings will generalize to other people or situations.Limitations of Randomized ExperimentsExperiments involving the random assignment of participants to conditions sometimes allow us to make causal conclusions if the variables that are manipulated are not confounded with other variables. Experiments gain rigor by controlling for influences outside of the variables of interest. However, there still may be limitations with respect to the generality of the findings.The experiment may have involved a specific group of people, certain situations, and only some of the possible conceptualizations of variables. Thus, we may not know whether the findings will generalize to other people, situations, or conceptualizations of the variables. Within  particular bounds, significant findings from an experim ental study may infer a general cause, but the presence of other unmeasured variables can limit that inference.Limitations of Survey InstrumentsSurveys that are distributed with time constraints were noted by Delva, Kirby, Knapper, and Birtwhistle (2002) as problematic in that people who struggle with real or perceived time constraints are less likely to respond to surveys because these possible respondents feel overworked – they just do not have the time to complete the survey. Surveys often also suffer the limitation of forcing respondents into particular response categories, thereby limiting the range of responses. Unlike an interview, where respondents can ask clarifying questions, respondents are usually limited to the text in the survey itself for direction about how to complete it and where to respond.DelimitationsThe delimitations of a study are those characteristics that arise from limitations in the scope of the study (defining the boundaries) and by the conscious e xclusionary and inclusionary decisions made during the development of the study plan. Unlike limitations, which flow from implicit characteristics of method and design, delimitations result from specific choices by the researcher. Among these are the choice of objectives and questions, variables of interest, the choice of theoretical perspectives that were adopted, the paradigm (qualitative/quantitative/mixed), the methodology, the theoretical framework and the choice of participants.The first delimiting step is the choice of problem, implying that there were other, related problems that could have been chosen but were rejected or screened off from view. To elucidate the delimitations of your study review each decision you had to make in putting together your study. In your purpose statement you declare what your study intends to accomplish. In the delimitations section you can repeat this declaration along with a pronouncement of what the study does not intend to cover. In the latt er case, your decisions for excluding certain pursuits are likely based on such  criteria as not directly relevant; too problematic because†¦; not feasible and the like. Make this reasoning as explicit as possible.

Contract terms as conditions or warranties Free Essay Example, 750 words

ï » ¿Contract terms as conditions or warranties A contract is an agreement put into force with a court order and regulates every transaction between the parties concerned. Such regulations that govern the relationship between parties in a contract are contained in the contract law. It is a body of law regulating contracts. A contract being a voluntary obligation, the law ensures that people have truly consented to the deals that bind them in courts. A contract forms when one person accepts it by communicating their assent or performing the offer’s terms. Such agreements are governed by principles, which in the broad category limit the parties to specific obligations or freedom. These principles form a basis under which a contract may be categorized as either a condition or a warranty (â€Å"UK Contract Law†, n.d. ). A condition is a material, major or significant term of a contract, which underlies the formation of a contract (Weitzenbà ¶ck, 2001; Carter and Hodgekiss, 1977). In other words, a condition is a term that goes to the root of a contract and, therefore, can render a contract enforceable in the favour of an innocent party if the terms of formation of the contract are breached (Collins, 2003; Richards, 2006). We will write a custom essay sample on Contract terms as conditions or warranties or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Therefore, innocent parties have a right to repudiate a contract and get discharged from performance of any outstanding obligations, which underlie the contract as well as a right to demand for damages in event of the breach. Therefore, unlike a warranty, a condition forms the backbone of the contract and results to legal ramifications under the contract law (Ayres, 2012). It is also imperative to note that conditions can either be implied or express conditions (â€Å"Classification of conditions†, n.d. ). A good example of a case involving a condition was the case of Poussard v. Spiers a singer was contracted to perform and sing for 3 whole months with six rehearsal days. The singer, however, fell ill and thus missed the six days of rehearsals, which resulted in the defendant replacing him with another singer. However, in this case the court held that the termination of the contract was uncalled for because the failure to attend the rehearsals only amounted to a breach of warranty and not a condition and thus the singer was entitled to the contract because the breach did not go to the contract’s very root (Bettin v. Gye, 1876). Thus, based on this case contracts can be categorised as conditions if the breach of the terms of the contract significantly or materially affects the performance of a contract and, therefore, becomes unenforceable to the innocent party’s favour (Smith and Atiyah, 2006). Another example of categorizing contracts terms as conditions or warranties was best articulated in the case of British Crane vs. Ipswich Plant Hire (1974) in which both companies were engaged in contracting out earth-moving equipment. In this case the plaintiffs provided the defendants with the equipment over the phone contract promptly without articulating the contract terms. However, the claimants later sent their conditions to the defendants but before signing them, the equipment sank in a marshy place. The defendants, however, wanted to avoid liability claiming there was no contract but the court held that, they were liable because the terms of the contract were standard in the business and, therefore, were implied conditions and would be traced to the contracts root (British Crane vs. Ipswich Plant Hire, 1974; â€Å"Exclusion Clauses Cases†, n.d. ). Therefore, from the cases above it is evident that the contract terms can be categorised as conditions; either as express or implied conditions. The terms goes to contract’s root cause and are void, voidable or can be rescinded at the innocent party’s choice. Thus, conditions whether implied or express are voidable and place no legal obligations on the innocent party but rather give him/her the right to sue for specific performance or damages as demonstrated in the above illustration cases. Ultimately, conditions unlike warranties are material terms of contract, which enforces obligations on the parties concerned. References Ayres, Ian. Studies in Contract Law. Foundation Press, 2012. Bettin v. Gye, (1876). British Crane vs. Ipswich Plant Hire, (1974) Carter, John W., and C. Hodgekiss. "Conditions and Warranties: Forebears and Descendants. " Sydney L. Rev. 8 (1977): 31. Classification of conditions or warranties. (n. d.). Available at: http: //www. lawteacher. net/free-law-essays/contract-law/classification-of-conditions-or-warranties-contract-law-essay. php [Accessed 31 march 2015]. Collins, Hugh. The law of contract. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Exclusion Clauses Cases. (n. d.). Available at: http: //www. lawteacher. net/cases/contract-law/exclusion-clauses-cases. php [Accessed 31 march 2015]. Poussard v. Spiers & Poland, (1876). Richards, Paul. Law of contract. Pearson Education, 2006. Smith, Stephen A., and Patrick S. Atiyah. Atiyah's Introduction to the Law of Contract. Oxford University Press, 2006. UK Contract Law: Conditions, warranties and intermediate terms. (n. d.). Available at: http: //www. wiselinklaw. com/show_jdal. asp? newsid=325&aa= [Accessed 31 march 2015]. Weitzenbà ¶ck, Emily M. "Electronic agents and the formation of contracts. " International Journal of Law and Information Technology 9, no. 3 (2001): 204-234.